Papers with evaluation model
Learning the Human Judgment for the Automatic Evaluation of Chatbot (2020.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation methods for dialogue systems rely on human judges to label quality of generated text. |
| Approach: | They propose a machine learning approach to reduce the effort of human evaluation by learning the human judgment on comparing two generative dialogue systems. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reduces the effort of human evaluation by learning which generative models is better in each dialog context. |
Reasoning with Trees: Faithful Question Answering over Knowledge Graph (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable progress in reasoning capabilities, yet they still face challenges in complex, multi-step reasoning tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that synergistically integrates LLMs with knowledge graphs (KGs) to enhance reasoning performance and interpretability. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods on two benchmark KGQA datasets and improves on the MCTS process. |
PLATO-2: Towards Building an Open-Domain Chatbot via Curriculum Learning (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | PLATO-2 is a high-quality open-domain chatbot that can generate one-to-many mappings and improve response quality. |
| Approach: | They propose a curriculum learning process to build a high-quality open-domain chatbot . they use a coarse-grained generation model and latent variables to train a generative model . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on Chinese and English data and can generate diverse responses and select the best response. |
Re-evaluating Automatic LLM System Ranking for Alignment with Human Preference (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Evaluating and ranking the capabilities of different LLMs is crucial for understanding their performance and alignment with human preferences. |
| Approach: | They propose a system-level evaluation framework that ranks LLMs based on their alignment with human preferences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework aims to rank LLMs based on their performance and alignment with human preferences. |
Language Models can Evaluate Themselves via Probability Discrepancy (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation frameworks focus on superficial text differences and fail to align with human judgment. |
| Approach: | They propose a new method to evaluate the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) by calculating probability discrepancies between original response generation and revised versions of LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method eliminates the need for training an additional evaluation model or relying on external proprietary models such as GPT-4 as a judger. |
Gradient-Based Adversarial Factual Consistency Evaluation for Abstractive Summarization (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstractive summarization models often produce inconsistent statements or false facts. |
| Approach: | They propose an efficient weak-supervised adversarial data augmentation approach to generate factual consistency datasets by backpropagating gradients on token embeddings. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can make interpretable factual errors tracing on public datasets and is cost-effective. |
Improving Recall of Large Language Models: A Model Collaboration Approach for Relational Triple Extraction (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing large language models can extract triples from simple sentences with few-shot learning or fine-tuning, but they often miss out when extracting from complex sentences. |
| Approach: | They propose an evaluation-filtering framework that integrates large language models with small models for relational triple extraction tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework integrates large language models with small models for relational triple extraction tasks. |
Weak Reward Model Transforms Generative Models into Robust Causal Event Extraction Systems (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation metrics that reflect the performance of causal event extraction tasks are poorly reflecting the inherent ambiguity of cause and effect boundaries. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a weak-to-strong supervision method to train an evaluation model while still achieving high performance in training an RL model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves high agreement with human-annotated data while still achieving high performance in training an RL model. |
Sequential-NIAH: A Needle-In-A-Haystack Benchmark for Extracting Sequential Needles from Long Contexts (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Yifei Yu, Qian-Wen Zhang, Lingfeng Qiao, Di Yin, Fang Li, Jie Wang, Chen Zeng Xi, Suncong Zheng, Xiaolong Liang, Xing Sun
| Challenge: | Recent models have extended Corresponding Author. context lengths to millions of tokens while maintaining reasoning and comprehension capabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate the ability of large language models to extract sequential information items from long contexts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves maximum accuracy of 63.50% on six well-known LLMs. |